Language switcher

Acute Effects on Circulation

Implementation of Matrix Rhythm Therapy and Convetional Massage in Young Females and Comparison of Their Acute Effects on Circulation

Authors: Ferruh Tasinar, PhD, Ummuhan Bas Alsan, PhD, Nuran Sabir, MD, and Ugur Cavlat, PhD

 

Abstract

Objectives: To examine and compare the effects of massage and matrix rhythm therapy in young women on the peripheral blood circulation.

Design: Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Setting: Pamukkale University in Denizli, Turkey.

Patients: Fifteen healthy women age 19–23 years.

Intervention: Matrix rhythm therapy was applied to the left lower extremity for a single 30-minute session. At least 1 week later, massage was applied to the left lower extremity for 30 minutes in a single session. The same physiotherapist applied both sessions.

Outcome measures: The blood velocity (cm/s), artery diameter (mm), and blood flow (ml/min) of the popliteal and the posterior tibial arteries were measured with color Doppler ultrasonography. All images were evaluated by the same radiologist.

Results: After matrix rhythm therapy and massage application, blood velocity, artery diameter, and blood flow in arteries increased. However, matrix rhythm therapy caused a more prominent increase in the amount of blood flow in the popliteal and in the posterior tibial artery than did massage. After matrix rhythm therapy application, the average increases in the blood flow rates in the popliteal and the posterior tibial arteries were 25.29% – 16.55% and 34.33% – 15.66%, respectively; after the massage, the increases were 17.84% – 17.23% and 16.07% – 10.28%, respectively.

Conclusion: Matrix rhythm therapy and massage increased peripheral blood flow in young women. Matrix rhythm therapy method resulted in more prominent increases.

To see the whole Study: Implementation of Matrix Rhythm Therapy and Convetional Massage in Young Females and Comparison of Their Acute Effects on Circulation
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Volume 19, Number 10, 2013, pp. 826-832